How Amarok people do moderation part 2

In part 1 I wrote how does the censuring work amongst the Amarok developers, then I've got comments that quoted aseigo's post about this topic, I didn't have time to read it, since having two jobs really takes away all my time, but my friend balazsbela pointed out one part that was left out:

"It is therefore vital for a community to come to a shared understanding, before crisis arrives, as to what the difference between vandalism of the shared space and merely objectionable expression is, and to ensure that that definition is conservative enough and respectful enough of future minority positions to avoid ever being twisted into simple censorship, especially censorship of convenience. (As in: "it's inconvenient to address that issue openly.")"

I can't help repeat my self again, that post that was nothing more than a personal retaliation, was published on the official amarok blog and planet KDE. I've red some terms described on planet KDE.

"Do not inflame

KDE covers a wide variety of people and cultures. Profanities, prejudice, lewd comments and content likely to offend are to be avoided. Do not make personal attacks or attacks against other projects on your blog."

So that's a double fail for Jeff there:

1) he made a personal attack against me on two(or maybe one) public space(s), and refused to let me speak up for myself(translation, refused to accept my comment on his post), which in turn is pure censorship and ignorance.

2) if I understood correctly planet KDE forbids posts that are about personal attacks like Jeff's revenge here.

So that concludes my "rant"(general truth) for today, I really think Jeff Mitchell (or should I say pirate of the __________(insert some funny word here)) would have been better of writing on a personal blog or simply adding a comment to my post than showing off his ego.